Tuesday, March 3, 2009

Free Agency, So Far . . .

I am excited about Antonio Smith for more balanced pass rush from the front four. His production, in terms of sacks, is not great. However, there is clear upside for this player. I am glad that we re-signed Eugene Wilson. I am hoping that a training camp with him will improve our coverage disguise. His experience in the Patriots system should be useful here. I am disappointed in our backup QB selection. Dan Orlovsky has not shown enough at this point to warrant anything more than opportunity to be a scout team QB. WIth Schaub's less than ideal health history, it is critical to have a quality backup to step in. Let's get Dunta signed up!

Sunday, February 15, 2009

Mockery of Drafts

It is that wonderful time of the year again. Who do we draft? What position do we need the most help with?

What draft philosophy do we pursue? Best available athlete? Position?

I will have my own wild guesses thoughtful analysis to post soon. In a frenzy of cut and paste I perused the World Wide Web and found these offerings. I nominate NFL Draft Site for the most over the top selection of Jeremy Maclin at WR for the Texans No. 1 pick. Close second would be cddrafts for their choice of a HB, Chris Wells.

 

I surveyed 16 mock draft sites. I was shooting for 20 but got bored. The consensus position is DE with eight of the sixteen picking a DE for the Texans. That is followed by CB with 5, two for a LB and then our WR and HB guys with one each respectively.    

 

 

Name

Position

Site

Aaron Maybin

DE – Penn St.

www.draftcountdown.com

 

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com

 

Michael Johnson

DE – Georgia Tech

http://www.nflmockdraftaces.com/

 

http://www.walterfootball.com/draft2009.php

 

http://blogs.chron.com/fanblogtexans

 

 

Brian Orakpo

DE – UT

http://newnfldraft.com/archives/573

Vonte Davis

CB – Illinois

http://cfn.scout.com/2/832662.html

 

http://www.nfldraftdog.com

 

http://www.draftking.com

 

http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/28774609/

 

http://www.fannation.com/

 

Everette Brown

DE – Florida St.

http://sports.espn.go.com

 

http://www.kffl.com/article.php/99957/512

 

Brian Cushing

LB – USC

http://www.mynfldraft.com/NFL-Mock-Draft

 

http://www.profootballcentral.com

 

Jeremy Maclin

WR – Missouri

http://www.nfldraftsite.com/

Chris Wells

HB – Ohio St.

http://cdsdraft.com/mocks/round-1.html

 

Wednesday, February 4, 2009

The Dream Season

Now that the 2008 season is complete, we can all make our wish lists for the Texans. We can start making our signs: "If the Cardinals can do it . . ." Some things to consider this offseason: I know Demeco Ryans is a pro bowl caliber middle linebacker. Is there a chance of him playing outside if available upgrades dictated it? Despite all of the 1st round picks on the D-line, couldn't we still use an upgrade in girth at DT and pass rush on the non-Mario end spot? There are lots of quality safeties in free agency. I would love to pursue some cover skills in the draft. Offensively, I want to see more ferocious guard play. I like the big running plays we have generated, but I want to push and wear on the opposing defense. I want to be able to run on 3rd and 2 with a high level of confidence. I don't see the tackle situation changing any time soon - and that is ok. It's the dream season. This is my wish list. What's on your wish list?

Saturday, January 10, 2009

AP Densive Player of the Year

I wish I could afford an editor here. I remember putting Andre Ware in the lineup for Dallas earlier in the year. But even a staff of Houstons Finest doesn't always get the results you want. In case you missed it the following was on the Chronicle's page the other day:

Densive could be a word.

Thursday, January 8, 2009

Frank Bush

When you try and get a feel for the defensive philosophy a position coach will employ if he gets promoted to Defensive Coordinator, you look to the DC’s he’s worked under in the past. Because Frank Bush has never been a DC, we need to look at the DC’s he’s worked under to get a feel for the kind of coach he’ll probably be.

When Bush moved from Scouting to Coaching in 1992, his first DC was Jim Eddy. All I know about Jim Eddy is that his defenses used a 4 man front. Jim Eddy had a pretty good Defense in 1992, with the 9th ranked defense overall and the 3rd ranked pass defense. Keep in mind that this was during Warren Moon’s heyday, and the run and shoot was in full force. The Oilers had the 6th best scoring offense. This means that other teams needed to score lots of points to have a shot at winning, which should mean lots more passing, and yet, they still have the #3 pass defense. I’m sure part of that is the players (including Jerry Gray at CB, another possible DC), but some of the credit goes to Eddy as the DC.

In 1993, Jim Eddy was replaced with Buddy Ryan. Buddy Ryan is famous for his aggressive 46 defense. Statistically, Ryan’s ’93 Oiler defense was great against the run, but poor against the pass. If Frank Bush had been a position coach under Buddy Ryan for a few more years, he probably wouldn’t have had to wait this long to get his shot at being a DC. As it is, Ryan was only in town for one year, and although this does mean that Bush knows what a 46 defense is, and how it should work (Unlike Richard Smith), he doesn’t really come from the Buddy Ryan coaching tree.

In 1994, Jeff Fisher was the DC for the Oilers, and he too ran the 46 defense. Under Fisher, the defense was probably more aggressive than it had been under Ryan. Fisher definitely comes from the Buddy Ryan coaching tree, which means that Frank Bush has two years of experience with this system. Despite the fact that two of his first three years as a coach were under 46 DC’s, I think his stop in Denver is where he really formed his identity as a coach.

From 1995 to 2000 Frank Bush worked for the Denver Broncos where Greg Robinson was the DC. This stretch is the first time that Bush had any consistency from the DC position, and this is one of the reasons why I think he gets his core defensive philosophy from this stretch. Matt at DGDB&D has a post where he goes over some of the potential DC’s. When he gets to Greg Robinson, he bases it off of the defense that Syracuse ran while he was the HC. Frankly, that’s more analysis than I could do. If anyone can find out the defense that Greg Robinson ran at Denver, I think that’s going to be the basic style of defense that Bush would run here.

From 2001 to 2003 Bush was the special teams coach for the Broncos. I don’t really see much to take from this stint. I guess it shows that he is capable of being in charge of an entire phase of the game, even if it is special teams.

From 2004 to 2006 Bush worked for the Cardinals under Larry Marmie and Clancy Pendergast. Hopefully by this time Bush already had a defensive philosophy and didn’t absorb too much from either of these DC’s, other than how not to do your job.

So, I’m now working under the assumption that if Frank Bush gets hired as the Houston Texans Defensive Coordinator, the defense will look a lot like the Denver Broncos defense did under Greg Robinson. So, with that in mind, how does our personnel stack up with what Denver had, particularly during the Broncos 1998 season when they won their second consecutive championship.

Houston Denver
DE: Mario Williams DE: Neil Smith
DE: Anthony Weaver DE: Maa Tanuvasa
DT: Travis Johnson DT: Keith Traylor
DT: Amobi Okoye DT: Trevor Pryce
SLB: Zac Diles SLB: Bill Romanowski
WLB: Xavier Adibi WLB: John Mobley
MLB: DeMeco Ryans MLB: Glenn Cadrez
CB1: Dunta Robinson CB1: Darrien Gordon
CB2: Jacques Reeves CB2: Ray Crockett
FS: Eugene Wilson FS: Steve Atwater
SS: Nick Ferguson SS: Tyrone Braxton
Ok, we’ll just work our way down the list.

  • Left Defensive End: Smith was a 6 time Pro-Bowler, and he led the league with 15 Sacks in 1993 and he made the Pro-Bowl in his fourth year pro. Mario Williams doesn’t have the same body of work, but at this point, it looks like Williams will be at least as good at DE as Neil Smith. I give the Texans a slight edge here, but Neil Smith was a pretty good DE, and the Texans get the nod here based on the fact that Mario looks better than Smith did at the same age.

  • Right Defensive End: Maa Tanuvasa had an inauspicious start to his playing career, getting drafted in the 8th round (209th overall) of 1993 and not becoming a starter until 1996, but in 1998 he led the team in Sacks with 8.5. The Broncos have a huge advantage at this position. Weaver has more interceptions than he does sacks, which means that DE is still a position that needs to be addressed. Bulman or Cochran could probably be about as productive as Tanuvasa though, so if we draft a stud DE in the draft, or acquire one in Free Agency, I’ll give the Texans the tentative edge. As it is, with Bulman and Cochran still on the team, I give the edge to the 98 Broncos, but it’s a lot less if you assume that Bulman or Cochran will be playing DE than if Weaver is.

  • Defensive Tackle: Keith Traylor was drafted by the Broncos in 1991 as a Linebacker. He was cut from a few different teams, and in NFL Europe he began to add weight to his frame so that he could convert to a D-lineman. In ’97, Traylor was brought back to the Broncos as a Free Agent. He led the team in tackles for D-linemen twice during his second stint there. Despite the fact that he used to be a linebacker I’m assuming that Traylor was the run-stuffing Defensive Tackle for the Broncos. Right now, the closest player we have to this position is Frank Okam. Travis Johnson has been trying to play the same role as Traylor, although nowhere near as effectively. With Johnson playing in 15 games this past season, and starting 14 (nominally at least), Johnson only registered 28 tackles compared to the 49 that Traylor had. I still think Okam has the potential to be a good DT, and to be better than Traylor, but based on what we’ve seen, the Broncos have a huge advantage at this position.

  • Defensive Tackle: Trevor Pryce seems to be the penetrating DT. Pryce was drafted in 97, and in 98 he tied for the team lead in sacks with 8.5. He’s the same type of player that Amobi Okoye is, but Pryce seems to be doing much better. Pryce is currently playing DE for the Ravens in a 3-4 scheme. Amobi has the potential to be at least as good as Pryce, but he’s got to do better than he did this past year. A new coordinator and a run-stuffing DT could be just what he needs. Right now, the Broncos have the edge based on actual productivity, but Amobi could change that in the upcoming season.

  • Strongside Line Backer: This position isn’t even close. Romanowski was one of the best at his position for several years. Diles performed admirably until he injured himself, especially considering he was a 7th round draft pick, but he’s no Romanowski. Part of the problem is that under Richard Smith, there wasn’t any defensive philosophy to speak of, and the two Outside Line Backers were interchangeable. Under Greg Robinson, there was a Strongside Line Backer, and his duties and responsibilities were different than those of the Weakside Line Backer. As a SLB, Romanowski is head and shoulders better than anyone we have. If you were to give Greg Robinson from 1998 our defense to work with, he’d probably be ok until he got to this position. If we’re going to run the same style offense that the Broncos did, this is a position that we need to address, either in the draft (Orakpo) or free agency. Huge edge to Denver. If Chaun Thompson is healthy next year, he would be a sleeper to play this position. He’s got the size/strength to be a SLB, and he was an OLB in Cleveland’s 3-4 defense, so he should have some familiarity with dropping back into coverage, and general linebacking responsibilities.

  • Weakside Line Backer: As a rookie in 1996, John Mobley played in all 16 games, and recorded only 61 tackles. In ’97 he recorded 132 and in ’98 he recorded 111. As a rookie, Adibi only played in 7 games, but he had 35 tackles. Adibi showed flashes of brilliance, and if he continues to improve, he could easily be as good as Mobley. Right now, the edge clearly goes to Denver, but Adibi has the skill set and the potential to be a very good WLB in this type of system.

  • Middle Line Backer: In 1998, Glenn Cadrez had 74 Tackles in what appears to be his first year starting at MLB, despite having been drafted in 1992 in the sixth round. DeMeco has started since his rookie year, and has been one of the best MLB’s in football. Finally, based on everything, the Texans have a huge advantage at this position.

  • Corner Back 1: At CB1, Darrien Gordon was pretty good. He had 63 tackles, 13 passes defensed and 4 interceptions. Dunta had 38 tackles, 6 passes defensed and only 2 interceptions, but he only started 6 games after coming back from a horrific knee/hamstring injury. Based on his earlier production, and the production he showed after coming back from the injury, I have to give the edge at this position to Dunta. If Dunta plays all season like he did at the end of the season, he’s the better CB.

  • Corner Back 2: In ’98 Crockett had 51 tackles, 13 passes defensed and 3 interceptions. Jacque Reeves had 52 tackles, 19 passes defensed and 4 interceptions. Statistically, Jacque Reeves is the better corner. As infuriating as Reeves was at the beginning of the season, he showed progress as the year progressed, and if he continues to progress, and learns to turn his head and use his arms, he could be a pretty good CB2. Right now, without knowing how well Crockett actually played, I have to give a very slight edge to Houston. Reeves being a useful component of our defense is predicated on our continued use of man coverage and not zone coverage.

  • Free Safety: To put it bluntly, if Greg Robinson, or any DC for that matter, had to go from Steve Atwater to Eugene Wilson, he’d need to be put on suicide watch. Atwater went to seven straight Pro Bowls from 1990-1996, went to an eighth in 1998 and was a huge leader in the locker room. By 1998, Atwater had lost a step though, and was only playing on first and second downs. His last great season was 1997, but he was still an above average FS. Eugene Wilson is the best Free Safety the Texans have ever had, and it’s still not even close. The Broncos defense has a monumental edge at this position, and if any DC is going to have success with our defense, this position is going to need to be upgraded.

  • Strong Safety: While the comparison of this position isn’t anywhere near as lopsided as for FS, Tyrone Braxton is a better SS than Nick Ferguson. In ’98 Braxton was one year away from retiring, but he was still capable of playing at a high level as demonstrated by his performance in the Super Bowl. Ferguson’s play this year has been average. Nothing spectacular, but at least we aren’t cursing his name after every game. The edge goes to the Broncos at this position as well.


So, what did we learn from that long, and tedious exercise, besides how to make people quit reading what I write? We learned that the defense for the 1998 Super Bowl Champion Broncos is better than the Houston Texans defense. That’s not really a surprise though. The point of this exercise was to see how far away the Texans are from being able to field a defense similar to the ‘98 Broncos.

At three of the most important positions (CB1, LDE and MLB) I think the Texans have better players than the Broncos did that year. At two more positions (CB2 and RDE) it’s pretty close to a draw or there is only a slight advantage one way or the other. At two more positions (DT and WLB) we have players in Amobi Okoye and Xavier Adibi that look like they’ll be as good as, if not better than, what the Broncos had. That leaves DT, SLB, FS and SS as positions that need to be addressed if we’re going to try and run a defense like the one Denver had.

With Frank Okam, we might already have the DT that we need for this scheme. Chaun Thompson (assuming he’s still alive) has the frame and the measurables to be a good fit for the SLB position. I doubt he’ll ever get close to Romanowski, but he should be competent at the position. If these two improbable players pan out, this just leaves 2 positions to be addressed during Free Agency and the Draft. That seems eminently doable.

Wednesday, December 31, 2008

Richard Smith - Yesterdays News

"I go over the three-year period and I look at how we progressed. I do not feel good about the progress we’ve made on that side of the ball, and I think for us to take the next step, we have to make a big-time improvement there. So it’s something that’s taken place over a long period of time. Like you said, this is not an overnight decision. It’s something that I’ve had a very difficult time with as we’ve worked toward it, but it’s a tough decision I had to make as part of my job.” Gary Kubiak

I had written the following as an introduction to a post lamenting the Texans 8-8 finish. The recent firing of Richard Smith makes most of it a moot point. Thankfully.

I had watched the debacle at Oakland last week and felt a deep sense of disappointment. The Texans showed us yet again that they are not prepared to assume the mantle of a division contender. I said I was disappointed. I was not surprised. I know that the game had absolutely no mathematical playoff ramifications. Yet it was a good measure of maturity and growth.

A good team would have taken their skills, their assets and matching them against a clearly inferior opponent, taken care of business. One of these assets is consistent effort and performance. This Texans team has not arrived at that point. This doesn’t speak to the physical acumen but the mental toughness and preparation. The results highlighted and magnified the weaknesses that exist on this roster.

The mental toughness is the players job. The prepartion is coaching. And it seems the latter has undermined the former on defense.

Unless these are addressed and corrected it will spell more of the same. When I watched the Oakland game for a second time it looked even worse. Not just the defensive side of the ball. Anyone on the Texans notice the Oakland linebackers keying on Slatons every move ?

Our defense is Richard Smith Predictable. One of our most glaring weaknesses: Our pass rush. If you can’t get pressure on the quarterback with the front four, and we can’t, you have to find another way to accomplish this. This QB dissecting our secondary was, if you remember, Jamarcus Russell ! I have written way too much about this and I haven’t even been around here much this year.

This decision moves the Texans forward. I think it came a year too late. And that is why I am not that excited about finishing at .500 again this year. It was a step backwards. Gary Kubiaks next decision about this coaching position will define the success or failure of his tenure here.

Tuesday, December 2, 2008

What would it take for Richard Smith to keep his job?

I know that this probably seems like a moot point, but after listening to Mike Clark all game over at Battle Red Blog, I'm feeling optimistic. So here's the questions: At what point do you decide not to fire Richard Smith?


As ridiculous as it may sound, the Texans are not yet mathematically eliminated from playoff contention yet. If they were to win out, they would finish 9-7, and depending on how other teams did, they would have a chance at making the playoffs.


If the Texans managed to make it into the playoffs after the season they've had, would you be willing to get rid of the DC? Would it matter if our defense had played well over the last few games?


The last two games, whoever has been in charge of the defense seems to have been calling more blitzes. If this keeps up, and we keep winning, we have to rethink our Fire Richard Smith campaign.


Starting at the most ridiculous of scenarios, and working our way back, I'd like to figure out when not firing Richard Smith becomes a viable option.


If the Texans:

  • Win the Superbowl = You Cannot Fire Dick Smith
  • Go to the Superbowl = You Cannot Fire Dick Smith
  • Go to the Playoffs = You Probably Shouldn't Fire Dick Smith
  • Finish 9-7 but don't make the playoffs = You Probably Shouldn't Fire Dick Smith
  • Finish 8-8 = At this point, it depends on how we've been winning
  • Finish 7-9 = Unless we've been pitching shutouts, I think this is when Richard Smith has to go
  • Finish 6-10 = Unless the Texans defense looks like a reincarnation of the 85 Bears, I don't care why we've been losing, I want Dick Smith gone.
  • Finish 5-11 = If we don't win another game, I can't think of an excuse to keep Dick Smith.

So to recap my little list, playoffs should allow Dick Smith to keep his job. I say this with the assumption that we are winning with the help of our defense, not in spite of it. If we manage to make it to the playoffs, I think it is a safe assumption that our defense has quit playing as horribly as it did throught most of the year. If we win 6 games in a row (including the most recent wins against Cleveland and Jacksonville) I think it will be a sign that our defense is playing much better. At this point, I'm still making the assumption that we're winning with the help of our defense, not in spite of them. Frankly, the only way we make it to this point is if the defense starts playing very well, and our offense plays like they have been.


At 8-8, we need to have been playing very solid defense, and our only loss needs to have come because of mistakes on the offensive side of the ball, not the defense. Any record worse than 8-8, and our defense would have to become dominant, whereas our offense becomes bad and ineffective in order for Dick Smith to have a legitimate argument for keeping his job. I can't really foresee this happening, even with Sage at the helm for the rest of the season, so any record worse than 8-8 is probably going to get pinned on Dick Smith.


Even after an uplifting Monday Night win, I'm only comfortable predicting a win against the Raiders. If we win two more games, it will be a surprise, and anything more than two will be the shock of the century. So a 6-10 season would not be surprising right now, and anything better than that would. Even with a surprise win somewhere in the next four games, I don't think it will be enough.


So, I think that if we win out, we need to keep Dick Smith as the DC, and see if he can continue this metamorphosis. If we don't win out, but the defense suddenly becomes a top ten defense, I think we keep Dick Smith, but have a replacement waiting in the wings (Frank Bush?). Anything outside of those two scenarios, and I think Dick Smith gets the Axe.


What would Dick Smith have to do, if it's even possible, to make you think he had earned a shot at being the DC again next year?

Tuesday, November 11, 2008

Texans-Ravens Thoughts

Before I get to the game, I have to make a confession. My allergies were acting up, so I took some Nyquil and slept through all but the first quarter of the game. That said, I've read the write-ups on DGDB&D and BRB, and I'm underwhelmed by the Texans.


At some point, Kubiak has to bear the blame for the Texans as a whole but I don't think that we've reached that point yet. I think that the blame for this season lands squarely on Richard Smith's shoulders. Kubiak's done well on the offensive side of the ball, but as the head coach, he has to make sure that the Defensive Coordinator is doing his job.


Not to pile onto Sage, but he's clearly not the answer. That said, I think that at some point he'll rebound and play a good game or two. It's just the nature of the beast. Sage is going to have a good game before Matt gets back. It might be against the Colts, but more likely against the Browns. I think the important thing in this adventure is to keep an even keel. Sage is not the worst QB in the history of ever. He's also not the savior of the franchise. Last season, I think he played over his head some, but I expect that Kubiak will put him in a position to succeed this coming week. If our defense could play at a respectable level, I'd be willing to think that we had a shot at beating any team in the league.


Just like Christmas decorations seem to come earlier every year, the time for talking about the draft seems to have arrived. The rest of the season should be spent evaluating our young talent; Specifically Frank Okam, Xavier Adibi and Antwaun Molden. If Okam can produce and be a big body in the middle of our D-line, we won't have to spend a high draft pick on a big Defensive Tackle. Between Earl Cochran, Mario Williams, Tim Bulman, Amobi Okoye and hopefully Frank Okam, we should have a good D-line.


Our Linebacking Corps seems pretty solid. In DeMeco Ryans, we have one of the best Middle Linebackers in the NFL. With Zac Diles, we have an undersized, but tenacious Strongside Linebacker. On the Weakside, Xavier Adibi seems ideal. He's relatively small, but he's quick. I think we can manage with Diles at SLB, but if we could get a prototypical SLB, I'd be happier.


Our secondary is a joke. Everyone knows this. Well, everyone but Richard Smith that is. Dunta Robinson is back, and by next season, he should be back to his old self. If Antwaun Molden shows that he is a capable Cornerback, then we can focus on finding a starting CB to match up with Dunta. Ideally, I'd like to see us drop an armored truck filled with money off at Nnamdi Asomugha's house. With Asomugha, Dunta would become the second best CB on the team and Bennet and Molden could play as Nickel backs until they're ready for the primetime. At Safety, I'm happy with Eugene Wilson and any of our many Strong Safeties.


On offense, I think we're very close to having all the pieces. Wide Receiver is our deepest position, and this is not a position that we need to address in the offseason. For purposes of this discussion, I'm including the Tight End with the Wide Receivers, especially as we don't need to address it in the offseason. With Wide Receiver and Tight End taken care of, we only need to discuss Quarterback, Runningback and the Offensive Line.


Matt Schaub is a good Quarterback. I don't think that he's a great Quarterback though, and I'm no longer willing to wager that he'll be healthy for an entire season. I'm also convinced that even though I think Sage will rebound and play a decent game or two, he's not the answer either. I think that while we still have both of these Quarterbacks on the roster we need to draft a QB high in the draft and then sit him for a year while he learns the system. The ideal situation would be if Graham Harrell fell to our draft spot in the second round. He seems to have all the physical and mental tools, with the only handicap being that he's used to playing in the gun.


At Runningback, Slaton has been a breath of fresh air. In order to get the maximum value out of him though, a big bruising runningback is needed. Preferably a runningback without horrific injury problems. I've been thinking about Jorvorskie Lane as a late round draft pick or an undrafted free agent pick up. His problem, as far as I can tell, is that he doesn't have the top end speed to succeed. He's got good acceleration, he's got good hands, and he likes contact. He's sort of like Ron Dayne, except that he's a power back, not just a slow back.


On the O-line, I think we're very close. I think that Winston is still a solid Right Tackle, I think that Brisiel/Studdard can make it as a Right Guard. I think that Pitts is a good Left Guard and I think that Duane Brown is pretty good for a rookie, and will continue to get better. This just leaves the Center. Last year when Steve McKinney was playing, we had a running game. When Flanagan stepped in, our running game dissappeared. Based partially on this, I think that the Center is the key to the whole O-line. What I'd like to see is a Center that's big enough to hold his own agaisnt some of the Defensive Tackles that we face, while still being quick enough to run the Zone Blocking Scheme. I think if we take care of Center, our running game will improve, especially in short yardage/goal line situations, and as a result our Play Action passing game will improve.


So, to wrap up, we'll win a few more games, and I may end up looking foolish for starting to talk about the Draft so early, but I think that we're just a few pieces away from being really good, and there's not anything that we can do about it until the offseason. I figure that we'll pick somewhere between 10-15, which is plenty high enough to get game changers.


Here's what I'd like to see:

  • 1st Round: Defense (Either Terrence Cody or a Strong Safety)
  • 2nd Round: Quarterback (Graham Harrell would be ideal if he somehow managed to fall this far)
  • 3rd Round: Center
  • 4th Round: Defensive End (to be converted into a Strongside Linebacker)
  • 5th Round: Best value available
  • 6th Round: Best value available
  • 7th Round: Best value available

Friday, November 7, 2008

Points to Ponder

As has been covered on several other websites, the Texans injury bug is back, and with a vengeance.

  • DeMeco isn't playing to his normal level. The suspected cause is an ankle injury, but no one knows because DeMeco refuses to go on the Injury Report.
  • Zac Diles broke his leg when he kicked himself while running at half speed during special teams practice.
  • Matt Schaub injured his MCL and is expected to be out for up to Four (4) weeks.
  • Ahman Green, after proving that he still has some gas left in his tank, promptly got injured.
  • Dunta still hasn't fully recovered from his knee/hamstring injury last year.
  • I think Jacque Reeves has some sort of lingering neck injury. It would explain why he can't turn his head around.


In other news, Duane Brown is still a rookie. This means that despite being a first round pick, he's not ready to play a full game. Some of this seems to be about his talent level, but most of it seems to be about his conditioning level. In some respects, it's a relief that he isn't playing every offensive snap because of his conditioning as opposed to his talent level. Whats worrisome about it, is that he's in the NFL, sohow did he not work on his conditioning more? It should be something he works on over the offseason, and he should be improved next year.



Steve Slaton is still showing flashes of brilliance, but they remain flashes. He remains a big play threat, but on most plays, you can expect him to plow into the line and gain two yards. I can think of two reasons why he keeps running up the middle: (1) The play is being called up the middle in which case Kubiak/Shanahan is to blame, or (2) Outside plays are called, and Slaton cuts inside, in which case Slaton is to blame. If the latter is the case, that has to be worked on, but we still seem in good shape. If the former is the case, then you have to wonder what the coaches are thinking. One of the alleged benefits of Zone Blocking is that it tires out the Defensive Linemen. If we run to the outside (assuming we can seal off the Defensive Ends and get a block on the Outside Linebacker) then we make the interior Defensive Linemen run, tiring them out. If we run it up the middle against Defensive Tackles like Pat and Kevin Williams or Albert Haynesworth, all we end up doing is tiring out our own Offensive Line and Runningback with the added bonus of making for difficult third downs.



Matt Schaub is quickly becoming a source of anger. It's not even directed at him, as much as the situations that he keeps putting the Texans in. I still think that when healthy, Schaub is the answer for the Texans at Quarterback. The problem is that he seems to keep getting injured. I keep hearing that any player who was on the receiving end of the blows that Schaub took would have gotten injured. I've seen the hits, and it's probably true. At some point however, it quits becoming a coincidence or bad luck and it becomes the fault of something that Schaub is doing. Either way, these next four weeks are going to be nerve racking. If we lose, we start talking about who's going to be available in the draft. If we win, we start talking about a Sage Rosenfels led Houston Texans team. Neither one of those outcomes seems particularly appealing.



On Defense, Richard Smith continues to be an anathema to Texans fans everywhere. Assuming that he's in charge of personnel, his decisions are baffling. Even if he's not, he's doing very little with what he's given. Our starting Defensive Line is worthless, with the exception of Mario Williams. Travis Johnson should not be starting, Amobi Okoye has regressed, and Zgonina is the oldest defensive lineman in the NFL, and yet, he still manages to work his way into the starting lineup. The only players who have produced besides Mario Williams are Tim Bulman and Earl Cochran, neither of which is starting. It's absolutely baffling.



At Linebacker, Xavier Adibi continues to suffer from the worst case of the flu mankind has ever seen. This is not to belittle him, it's just frustrating. I know that he lost a lot of weight, and that you can't really control when you get sick, but this is ridiculous. Morlon Greenwood seems to have heard about how excited many Texans fans were with his caliber of play last year, and has made it his mission to make us regret that excitement. As mentioned above, DeMeco is playing injured and Zac Diles, who had been one of the pleasant surprises of the season, is out for the rest of the year after a fluke injury. Kevin Bentley is expected to take his spot in the starting lineup.



Our defensive backs are awful. Reeves and Faggins may be the worst corner combo in the league, Fred Bennet is playing worse than he did as a rookie, and Dunta is even whiffing on plays. It's an ugly sight. The one bright spot has been our secondary play. During the draft, I tried to advance the idea of drafting a Free Safety. I still think that a good FS can take pressure off of our horrible secondary and frees up the Strong Safety to make plays in the run game. We got Eugene Wilson as a free agent after training camp, and he's been as good of a FS as the Texans have had. It's been refreshing. I would still like to see a Free Safety drafted early, but with Wilson, we can do without it if there isn't any value at that position in the draft.



Finally, Chester Pitts has a blog at the Chronicle. At first I was hopeful. His first post was biographical in nature. Nothing wrong with that. The next two posts were about Pitts and some other players going to a Katy elementary school and trying to do the Hula Hoop. At this point, I became a little dubious, but I was still hopeful that we'd get some more substantive posts. The last post made me sad. Specifically this quote:

"Receivers run and catch HOT routes and quarterback's have the ultimate authority of it all. On where and who we are assigned to block, making throws where they need to go and on time. Bet you never would have thought that football was this complex? As long as the quarterback play is great, like we have had, and he gets passes thrown on time, then we look great! If not, it is the complete opposite."
It's not written poorly or anything, it's just disappointing. I was hoping that it would be written with more depth of knowledge. It seems like people reading the sports section of the Chronicle already realize that football was complex. It's written for more casual fans, it just seems like a wasted opportunity to me. Although, as a blogger who hasn't posted anything since October 14th, I really don't have any room to talk.



Wednesday, October 29, 2008

Three in a Row! I'm Listening

In years past, when the Texans shared a record with other teams in the division, there are still some sense of inequality. Having played all of the teams in the division, I believe we fans know that we are closer to equals than ever before. We are better and they are worse. I'm excited about Dunta Robinson being back. It seemed like the defense rallied around him last week. Pass plays that were normally complete were getting batted down. We didn't look like pushovers. They yards allowed per rushing attempt remains high. In addition, their third down success rate on defense remains low and did not improve as a result of the Bengal game. Since they only allowed 6 points, we are happy. The point is that they are still vulnerable. So, what do we have to look forward to against Minnesota? First of all, time of possession is going to be critical. The style of offense that the VIkings run, if done successfully, is a running and short passing attack. This should generate a lot of game defining 3rd down opportunities for the defense this week. The Vikings offense has only scored one touchdown at home this year. If we get them off the field on 3rd down, I think we can pick them apart with our passing game. The Vikings opponents have run the football only to keep them honest. At 2.9 yards per carry, the Vikings defense ranks third in the league. They are scary good at home on defense and not so scary on the road. Here's the key: Matt Schaub and the Texans cannot turn the football over. That is the key to the Vikings Success (8 fumbles, 4 interceptions). They have six defensive or special teams returns for touchdowns (of 19). Basically, we need to play the same turnover free style of football we have played for two weeks. We have an opportunity to win a road game for the first time this season. Coach K, let's talk to the guys about stiffening on third down and protecting the rock.

Thursday, October 23, 2008

Two In A Row! Who Cares?

The offense is now considered among the tops in the league. The Chron is raving about time of possession. The Texans have one two in a row. Dunta is back. Things seem to be all better. Did anyone see Petey chasing after Calvin Johnson on Sunday? That is our defense in a nutshell. We're among the worst in scoring defense. We allow more than 8 yards per pass attempt and 4 yards per rush. Although we perform better than average on third down, teams seldom need third down to be successful against us. This Sunday should be much easier for us without Carson Palmer under center. I do expect a victory on Sunday, but I am not excited about our opportunity to take the next step in 2008. We need better secondary players and a new defensive coordinator. The running game is improving. I would still like to see us drive defenses off the ball in short yardage. We need that execution against teams like the Jaguars and Titans. For the first time in the history of the franchise, I will say that it is up to the offense to carry the Houston Texans. We've come a long way when you consider it. David Carr and Dom Capers are distant in the rear-view mirror.

Tuesday, October 14, 2008

Thoughts on the Texans-Dolphins game

Over on the BRB main page is a quote from yours truly. Apparently, they thought it was either a good summation of the atmosphere or just weird enough that it was the quote of the day so to speak. The gist of that quote was that right after the game on Sunday, I felt just like I did after winning a 7th grade football game. Back in 7th grade, I was playing on the B team, on account of not being particularly good. I don't remember what our record was, but I know that it wasn't pretty. After we won a game though, we were all so excited that we started chanting "We're # 1". The cheers on that bus lasted from the stadium all the way back to the school. If anyone on that team had stopped to think about what our record was compared to the other teams in our district, it would have been clear that, no, we weren't actually # 1, but at the time, we didn't care. We were caught up in the euphoria of a win. That euphoria was the spirit in which my quote was meant.

The game on Sunday was an ugly win. Despite a team record for receiving yards by a receiver (178 by Andre Johnson) and throwing yards by a quarterback (379 by Matt Schaub), we squeeked out a win with only 3 seconds remaining. At the end of the game though, I wasn't thinking about four (4) turnovers or squandered opportunities in the red zone, I was only thinking about how great it was to finally get that first win. For me at least, this euphoric feeling was largely caused by the relief of finally winning, not just the manner in which we won.

I can still remember the excitement that everyone on that bus felt as we rode back to the school, but looking back, I'm a little embarrassed about that chant of "We're # 1" because we weren't a very good team. Basically, the chant didn't match the team. My hope for this Texans team is that at the end of the season, we'll remember how excited we all were to get this first win, but we'll think that we were over-reacting; That our excitement for the first win did not match the team. To put it another way, I hope that we'll feel foolish for not having taken the first few losses in stride, and for not having confidence that our team is good, and will win games.

Enough of the walk down memory lane, on to the game itself.

The Bad -
  • Four turnovers and a -3 turnover ratio for the game. We will not be able to win many more games if we continue to turn the ball over at this rate.
  • Poor secondary play. The biggest gaffe of the whole game occurred when Brandon Harrison let Patrick Cobbs run right past him on the reverse pass play out of the wildcat formation in the first quarter. Cobbs actually ran past two of our players in the secondary, but only Harrison is playing safety, also known as the last line of defense.
  • Our defense seems unable to make a big stop when it counts. This is not a recent occurrence, which is why it is even more troubling.
The Good -
  • The name of the game today was redemption. Matt Schaub redeemed himself for those two interceptions he threw to start the game by setting a Texans record for yards in a game with 379 yards. In addition, Schaub was involved in both offensive touchdowns. In his defense, he was being hit as he threw the ball for the first interception, so I don't think he had full control over where that ball went. The second INT was just a bad play on Schaub's part, and there's no excuse for it.
  • Andre Johnson started out alright, but he could have easily cost us the game when he fumbled the ball at the goalline. His fourth down catch late in the fourth quarter was a catch that only a few other Wide Receivers in the NFL could have made. In addition to that circus catch, he set a career high, as well as a Texans record with 178 yards through the air.
  • Mario Williams continues to show everyone that he is the best Defensive End in the NFL. He had two more sacks, bringing his season total to six.
  • This isn't related to the Dolphins game, but the Houston Texans website has announced that Dunta Robinson will begin practicing on Wednesday, and may see game time as early as this Sunday against the Lions. If he can somehow come back at even 80% of his former self, he'll be a huge upgrade in a very suspect secondary.
  • Regardless of what this game looked like, a win is a win, and at the end of the day, that's all that really matters.

Sunday, October 12, 2008

Sweet Victory

The first game the Texans played was a blowout, and the Texans had no business being on the same field as the Steelers.

The second game the Texans played might as well have been a blowout, because the final score is all that really matters.

The third game was a huge dissapointment. Our offense played well, but our defense just couldn't get the Jaguar's offense off of the field.

The fourth game was arguably the most heartbreaking game in the short existence of the Texans.

Finally, we have a victory. It didn't matter how close we came in the first four games, because a loss is a loss and moral victories don't count, so I don't care how close this game was to being a loss, because a win is a win. More to come later. For now, I'm just going to enjoy the fact that the Texans are not one of the only remaining winless teams in the NFL.

Sunday, October 5, 2008

Bitter Loss

I have been away adjusting to new hours and a new job with limited access to a computer. Couple that with my Hurricane Ike Recovery project and they don't add up to quality time here.

Last year I did a very good comparison of Schaub and Rosenfels in the red zone which statisticaly gave Rosenfels a clear edge over Schaub. But somehow I could never get on the Rosenfels bandwagon. Even after the Schaubs shaky performances in games one and two.

"Schaub is the number one guy. Ask Kubiak. I am still worried about his performance in the red zone. He has not completed an entire year as a starting quarterback. He does demonstrate some raw talent that Sage Rosenfels will never have.

If he stays healthy he can polish that talent and that upside potential is why he is ahead of Rosenfels in the lineup." Outlaw

Today the quarterback controversy is solved. Sage Rosenfels will fulfil his role as a back up. He is not starter material. It remains to be seen if Schaub is. Rosenfels meltdown in the last five minutes of a won game was historical in its proportions.

I am a fan and I have to do what I can to move on to the next one. As an armchair analyst I found plenty to like about the Texans effort. Make no mistake. The Texans had pummeled the Colts. They had been beaten on both sides of the ball. But our Texans were not ready to move past the level of incompetence they have shown throughout there existence.

So the cliche "Snatched defeat from the jaws of victory" was heard all over the networks and radio. So now the Texans sit at 0-4. Shoulda. Woulda. Coulda. How close and how far away was 2-2 ? Another league. More to say later.

Monday, September 29, 2008

Thoughts on the Texans-Jaguars Game

I'm still not sure why we always get fired up for the Jaguars, but we do. Apparently we still didn't get fired up enough. The good news about this game is that there is some good news. The bad news is that despite doing some things well, we still lost.

First things first, we'll start with what we did well -
  • We threw the ball well. Schaub started out with short passes that were eerily reminiscent of David Carr's tenure as Texans QB. Schaub distinguished himself by throwing the deep ball a few times. Schaub's performance this week should put a stop to all of the QB controversy talk for a while.
  • Kevin Walter seems to have great chemistry with Matt Schaub. Schaub knows where Walter will be and trusts him to catch the ball.
  • Our offensive line is capable of providing decent, if not good, pass protection. There were times that Jacksonville defenders hit Schaub, but they were relatively few and far between.
  • Steve Slaton is not only able to pass block, but he is willing. This is a very good thing. (I'm looking at you Chris Taylor)
  • When they put their minds to it, our defense is capable of stopping a very good running game. It's been mentioned earlier, but Jones -Drew and Taylor were limited to a combined 13 yards in the first half. That is outstanding run defense.
  • Kris Brown is still Mr. Automatic.
  • Finally, we were in the game until the bitter end.
Now, all of that is great, and if we had won the game, everything else in the game might not have left such a bad taste in my mouth. On to the bad things -
  • We did not run the ball well. We had 89 yards of total rushing, 24 of which came from Schaub. 55 yards rushing between Chris Taylor and Super Steve Slaton. I guess one game was not a large enough sample size. Then again, keeping that lesson in mind, this game was not a large enough sample size to declare him a poor running back.
  • Andre Johnson was M.I.A. thoughout the whole game. Walter had a great game, but Kevin Walter is no Andre Johnson. If we're going to make any amount of noise in the NFL this season, Andre Johnson is going to have to play a much larger role.
  • Our secondary isn't just a sieve, it's a gaping hole. We dared the Jaguars to beat us by throwing the ball, and they were more than happy. We made the Jaguars receivers look like legitimate NFL receivers. Thinking back on the game, without the benefit of Tivo, I can think of one play where a Texan defender got a hand/arm in between the receiver and the ball. It was DeMeco Ryans. As great as he is, DeMeco is not a part of the secondary.
  • C.C. Brown got injured. My hope is that this can turn into a positive for us. I still don't know why the Texans refuse to play a true FS; Maybe Eugene Wilson has some nagging injury, or maybe he can't figure out our defensive playbook (I'm assuming that we have one, but I could easily be wrong on this). If Wilson can play like he did in New England, then he has the potential to make our secondary better. We can move Will Demps to his more natural position of SS, and improve all around.
  • There is absolutely no way that a timeout shouldn't have been called by either the punt return team or by a coach on the sideline when the punter lined up as a tight end.
Ok, it's very easy to play the what if game, and say that we would have won this game if Jacksonville had gotten stopped on that fake punt. I don't buy that personally, because we still had a chance to win the game at the end, but we couldn't manage it. I don't care what happens on a teams first drive. If you have a chance to win at the end of the game, that play becomes moot, except to later show the ineptitude of the coaches.

Overall, I think the team played well, but obviously not well enough. I'm encouraged by the positives to be taken from this game, and I think that they can be built on, but the ultimate measure of a team is it's win-loss record, not how hard they played. Still, it's early in the season, and the Texans were expected to come out of their first games at 2-3, maybe even 1-4. We've played 3 games so far, and we didn't look competetive against two of the best defenses in the NFL. It's a long season, and we still have time to get our act together. Indy will be a good indicator for the rest of our season. If we win that game, we start a streak of winnable games with some confidence. If we are competitive against the Colts, I still think that we go into the next few games with some confidence, and a legitimate chance to get some swagger. If we get dominated, it could be the beginning of a very long season.